[ad_1]
Glassnode’s latest Week Onchain report shows that roughly 10.83 million BTC are now in the red, against 9.22 million still in profit.
Loss-making supply now accounts for roughly 54% of the measured total, compared with 46% still in profit, meaning underwater coins exceed profitable coins by about 1.61 million BTC.
Infographic showing 54% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply (10.83 million BTC) is held at a loss, exceeding the 46% held in profit by roughly 1.61 million BTC.
Glassnode describes this as one of the sharpest deteriorations in investor profitability since the current bull market began, a threshold with real psychological weight.
Crossing it before has coincided with genuine capitulation among newer buyers, the kind of stress that shapes a structural drawdown.
Underwater holders are the ones most prone to selling into panic or exiting near breakeven once the price recovers, which keeps a layer of resistance above the market.
Yet those same coins can migrate to higher-conviction buyers if patient capital is willing to absorb them, and Glassnode’s data shows exactly that kind of buyer has begun to show up.
The seller profile is already changing underneath that stress, as Glassnode says long-term holders have started rebuilding positions, a reversal from an extended stretch of distribution, with net position change back in positive territory.
The pace stays modest, well short of the buying waves seen in prior accumulation cycles, but the direction has turned. The first sign of a bottom often shows up here, in experienced holders deciding a drawdown is worth buying, well before price itself confirms anything.
Glassnode’s Accumulation Trend Score climbed across multiple cohorts this week, with the strongest readings among wallets holding less than 1 BTC and entities holding 100 to 1,000 BTC.
Wallets in the 1,000-to-10,000 BTC range also turned net buyers. Bitcoin’s quiet bid is spreading across the entire ownership ladder, from the smallest wallets to mid-sized entities.
US-traded spot Bitcoin ETFs remain in sustained net outflow territory, and that selling pressure has persisted even as on-chain conviction builds in the opposite direction. The ETF story explains why the price stays weak, while the on-chain story explains who is taking the other side.
Market layerCurrent signalWhat it meansArticle implicationETF investorsSustained net outflowsRegulated wrappers are still de-riskingExplains why price remains weakLong-term holdersNet position change back in positive territoryExperienced holders are rebuilding exposureSuggests supply is moving to patient handsSmall walletsStrong accumulation among sub-1 BTC walletsRetail-sized holders are buying the drawdownThe bid is not only institutional or whale-drivenMid-sized entitiesStrong buying among 100–1,000 BTC entitiesLarger on-chain holders are also absorbing supplyAccumulation is broadening across cohortsLarge wallets1,000–10,000 BTC wallets turned net buyersBigger holders are no longer only distributingConfirms the seller profile is changingSpot order booksCoinbase and Binance shifting toward bidsBuyers are placing liquidity below spotA base can form even while price looks weak
Coinbase and Binance both show books shifting toward the bid, with buyers adding liquidity below spot. That bid looks patient, which is why the price can still look weak even as a base starts to form underneath it.
Hyperliquid traders hold a long bias at the highest level Glassnode has tracked, using leveraged exposure to bet on a bounce before spot conviction is fully confirmed.
The cash market is trying to build a floor, while the derivatives market is trying to get there first.
Options traders are already paying up for protection: the 14-day put-to-call volume ratio climbed above 1.0, its highest reading in a year. Implied volatility is climbing too, up from depressed levels, though Glassnode stops short of calling it a panic reading.
The market carries enough fear to begin bottoming, though the fear needed to confirm a finished capitulation may still be building.
Put together, the pattern looks unusual for a bottoming process, and Bitcoin may be finding a floor through an unusual mechanism: ETF investors are selling while stronger, more patient hands absorb the exit in real time.
CryptoSlate Daily Brief
Daily signals, zero noise.
5-minute digest 100k+ readers
Whoops, looks like there was a problem. Please try again.
You’re subscribed. Welcome aboard.
Glassnode frames it as an early, still-developing bottoming process and flags that a final capitulation-driven volatility spike stays possible.
Long-term holders buying also trails the scale of prior accumulation waves by a wide margin, keeping the recovery in accumulation fragile.
Bitcoin can probably bottom without ETF inflows returning, as long as outflows slow enough to stop overpowering on-chain accumulation, and the crowded long positioning on Hyperliquid unwinds gradually through price strength.
ScenarioWhat happens nextConfirmation signalWhat it meansBull case: controlled migrationETF outflows slow while long-term holders and wallet cohorts keep accumulatingBid-heavy order books absorb underwater supply; Hyperliquid longs resolve through a bounceThe transfer phase becomes the bottomBase case: fragile bottomingAccumulation continues, but ETF outflows and underwater supply keep rallies cappedBTC chops sideways while loss supply stops expandingBitcoin builds a base, but recovery stays unevenBear case: final capitulationCrowded Hyperliquid longs get flushed while ETF outflows persistImplied volatility spikes and underwater holders capitulate lowerSupply still transfers to stronger hands, but through a sharper washoutFailure case: accumulation fadesLong-term holder buying slows and cohort accumulation narrowsBid-heavy order books disappear; ETF outflows keep dominatingThe market was pausing inside a broader drawdown, not bottoming
How this plays out
In the bull case, ETF outflows continue but slow, while long-term holders and broader wallet cohorts continue to accumulate through the summer.
Bid-heavy order books keep absorbing supply from newer, underwater holders, and the aggressive Hyperliquid long positioning resolves through a genuine bounce.
Bitcoin’s correction becomes a controlled migration, from ETF sellers and short-term holders into the hands of patient on-chain capital, and the transfer phase becomes the bottom.
In the bear case, the crowded long positioning in Hyperliquid gets flushed, ETF outflows persist, and underwater holders capitulate at lower prices.
Implied volatility spikes toward genuine panic levels, and long-term holder accumulation slows as the drawdown deepens. Bitcoin still ends up transferring to stronger hands, but through one final capitulation event.
Bitcoin’s next bottom may begin with an unusual sequence: institutions leaving, weaker holders capitulating, and stronger hands quietly taking the other side. A bottom starts as a turnover in who owns the supply, well before it shows up in price.
[ad_2]
Source
